EMFs are the new smoking..

What about cartoon characters smoking cigarettes?

This was all normal.

When the first evidence came in that smoking caused lung cancer… everyone was in denial.

The tobacco industry (who made lots of money off of people smoking) spent lots of money to cover up the evidence, and hired their own scientists to produce what’s now referred to as ‘Tobacco science”.

This deception worked for 50 years!

This is called the “Tobacco Playbook”.

Fast-forward to 1990’s where the evidence of harm got so overwhelming that the Tobacco companies finally got slammed.

Who were the real victims though?

The millions of people who were led to believe that something was safe (tobacco), when in reality, it really wasn’t…

People were dying — all because an industry was afraid to lose money.

The doctors in this scenario, who could have helped — they were misinformed too. Most of them even scoffed at the silly idea that tobacco could cause cancer.

Now, I know you’re saying: “Great Nick! What does this have to do with EMFs?”

Let’s look at the facts, shall we?

  1. In 2011: EMFs from cell phones, wifi and Bluetooth are declared a Class 2B “Possible” carcinogen.
  2. November 2018 (a few days ago!): EMFs are confirmed a Class 1 “Definite” carcinogen by the US $25 Million NTP study.
  3. “Tobacco” and “Asbestos” are also confirmed as Class 1 “Definite” carcinogens.
  4. We are exposed to 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 times higher amounts of EMFs than our ancestors.
  5. EMFs have been linked with fatigue, sleep disturbance, lowered fertility, anxiety, depression, cancer, dizziness, memory loss, ADHD, and a slew of other symptoms and conditions.

When it comes to EMFs, it’s not either you smoke or you don’t smoke. EVERYONE is 2nd hand smoking.

This includes 4 year olds. A 2014 survey by the American Academy of Pediatrics has showed that 75% of 4-year olds possess their own cell phone!

The Telecommunications Industry is following the “Tobacco Playbook” to the letter, and it’s working like gangbusters.

This all can sound grim, but trust me that there’s light at the end of the tunnel…

We don’t have to all be 2nd hand smokers. We can demand safer technologies. We can win this battle.

Read More

MD “Blows Lid Off” Microwave Industries Not Measuring Cumulative EMFs/RFs

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question. We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects…5G is an untested application of a technology that we know is harmful; we know it from the science. In academics, this is called human subjects research. … Dr. Sharon Goldberg

(Source)

Dr. Goldberg hammers home obvious, deliberate and apparently purposeful omissions of measuring cumulative doses of microwave-produced non-ionizing radiation humans are exposed to minute-by-minute, not just from a 6 minute cell phone call or a 30 minute rat exposure studies the World Health Organization and industry associations, e.g., ICNIRP, like to trot out as ‘proof’ of safety!

In her 5-minute testimony, Dr. Goldberg covered a lot of medical science ground regarding the role of RFs in diabetes and other epidemics she identifies.

Perhaps hearing Doctor explain what she knows of the science about microwave damages to humans, the environment and all life forms will impress you more than I probably can.

Dr. Sharon Goldberg, MD, Testifies at Michigan’s 5G Small Cell Tower Hearing
14:49 minutes

https://youtu.be/CK0AliMe-KA?t=26

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Elf Emf Health, Emf Exposure And Health, Emf Exposure Health Risk, Emf From Power Lines Health Effects, Emf Health And Safety, Emf Health Concerns, Emf Health Effects, Emf Health Effects In Humans, Emf Health Effects Research, Emf Health Issues, Emf Health Research, Emf Health Risks, Emf Health Studies, Emf Health Summit, Emf Health Symptoms, Emf Health Who, Emf On Health, Emf Radiation Health Hazards, Emf Radiation Health Problems, Emf Wifi Health

Read More

Quitting Smoking Is Easier Than Avoiding EMF Radiation

How much more proof do we need that being online isn’t healthy for us?

The latest terrible tech research is from Kaiser Permanente, published last week in the journal Scientific Reports. In a study of hundreds of pregnant women in the Bay Area, the authors found that those who were more exposed to the kind of radiation produced by cell phones, wireless networks and power lines were nearly three times as likely to suffer miscarriages.

It goes without saying that these electromagnetic fields, or EMFs, are around every single one of us. Thanks to our insatiable demand for social media, GPS and “smart” physical devices, there will be more and more of them every year.

I was a bit surprised by the Kaiser study’s publication.

Not because I doubt its findings — it seems sensible to assume that if radiation is powerful enough to transmit data through the ether, it’s probably powerful enough to scramble our cells as well.

Plus, I live in the Bay Area.

People who don’t live here think this place is nothing more than a magnet for any and every whiz-bang tech idea.

Those of us who actually live here know that there’s a counterveiling force of skepticism to meet every single one of those ideas.

That’s why Instacart will never replace Berkeley Bowl. It’s also why San Francisco and Berkeley — cities that are awfully friendly to technology in other ways — both passed laws requiring cell phone retailers to post warning signs about radiation, citing concerns about cancer, brain tumors and reproductive health.

But there will be tremendous pushback against any research showing how dangerous this stuff may be.

An example: San Francisco’s radiation-warning law, championed by then-Mayor Gavin Newsom, passed in 2010. But after a lawsuit from the cell phone industry, the city backed off on implementing it.

Around the same time, the California Department of Public Health drew up its set of guidelines to inform the public about the risks associated with cell phone use.

The health department then sat on these guidelines — for seven years — until The Chronicle told the state it was going to publish a news story about the case, and a judge signaled that she would order them to be released.

The reason for the delay?

The health department’s lawyers claimed the agency isn’t required to warn the public of health risks that haven’t been proved (despite the fact that the information was gathered by the agency’s own scientists). The lawyers also argued that releasing the guidelines might cause the public to panic.

Well, it might be time to start panicking. More and more, it sounds like the long-term effects of our Internet habits could be dangerous, not just for our relationships and our ability to focus, but our brains and bodies as well.

To this member of the public, the small-but-growing body of EMF research looks like anti-tobacco research must have looked in the 1950s — necessary and important work that will surely gain researchers an ugly, uphill battle against better-funded opponents.

Even more disconcerting?

Once scientists knew how dangerous tobacco was, the public could clearly and simply understand how to prevent those dangers: stop smoking.

But I’m not sure there’s any way to turn back the clock on EMFs.

I read the story about Kaiser’s new study on my cell phone, traveling between my office (which is replete with Wi-Fi networks) and my home (same). I happened to be traveling on BART, so when I put my phone down I studied the passengers around me.

Every sitting passenger was hunched over their phone, as if in prayer. The strap-hangers held their phones in front of their faces; the blue screens glided through the air like fish in an aquarium. All of this was normal, if vaguely depressing; a pageant I see and participate in every day.

But I also noticed, as if for the first time, how many people were wearing wireless Airpods and other earbuds. They wore them with a certain pride of ownership, as if they were in on a secret the rest of us were yet to learn.

I watched them, and thought about the public health guidelines that went unreleased for seven years. I thought about how the guidelines suggested removing headsets as soon as calls are over, and keeping the phone away from your body.

I thought about how many recent cell phone “improvements” chip away at that guidance. Then I lifted my phone from my lap and dropped it in my bag, out of sight.

Caille Millner is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: cmillner@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @caillemillner

Read More