When the first evidence came in that smoking caused lung cancer… everyone was in denial.
The tobacco industry (who made lots of money off of people smoking) spent lots of money to cover up the evidence, and hired their own scientists to produce what’s now referred to as ‘Tobacco science”.
This deception worked for 50 years!
This is called the “Tobacco Playbook”.
Fast-forward to 1990’s where the evidence of harm got so overwhelming that the Tobacco companies finally got slammed.
Who were the real victims though?
The millions of people who were led to believe that something was safe (tobacco), when in reality, it really wasn’t…
People were dying — all because an industry was afraid to lose money.
The doctors in this scenario, who could have helped — they were misinformed too. Most of them even scoffed at the silly idea that tobacco could cause cancer.
Now, I know you’re saying: “Great Nick! What does this have to do with EMFs?”
Let’s look at the facts, shall we?
In 2011: EMFs from cell phones, wifi and Bluetooth are declared a Class 2B “Possible” carcinogen.
November 2018 (a few days ago!): EMFs are confirmed a Class 1 “Definite” carcinogen by the US $25 Million NTP study.
“Tobacco” and “Asbestos” are also confirmed as Class 1 “Definite” carcinogens.
We are exposed to 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 times higher amounts of EMFs than our ancestors.
EMFs have been linked with fatigue, sleep disturbance, lowered fertility, anxiety, depression, cancer, dizziness, memory loss, ADHD, and a slew of other symptoms and conditions.
When it comes to EMFs, it’s not either you smoke or you don’t smoke. EVERYONE is 2nd hand smoking.
This includes 4 year olds. A 2014 survey by the American Academy of Pediatrics has showed that 75% of 4-year olds possess their own cell phone!
The Telecommunications Industry is following the “Tobacco Playbook” to the letter, and it’s working like gangbusters.
This all can sound grim, but trust me that there’s light at the end of the tunnel…
We don’t have to all be 2nd hand smokers. We can demand safer technologies. We can win this battle.
For those who are ambivalent about microwave and “smart” technologies, or truly are addicted and can’t live without them, I’d like to introduce you to two important works written by an MD who understands fully what’s going on and the ‘games’ being played by vested interest groups for the control and implementation of a “new world order” based in illogical consensus science rather than actual hard-core scientific principles.
The Doctor is Cindy Russell, a plastic surgeon who treats breast cancer patients; is Vice President of Community Health for the Santa Clara County Medical Association; and is Executive Director of Physicians for Safe Technology.
Dr. Russell created the following works, which I deliberately will not parse because I absolutely believe it is critical for readers to digest what she says and ultimately “drives home.” I would not want to detract from her excellent dissertations regarding:
27 pages equally overflowing with citations and references that equate the current electromagnetics, microwaves, radiofrequencies and other man-made EMF spectrums with the ecological and human health problems author Rachel Carson pointed out regarding chemicals in her famous 1962 book, Silent Spring. Fifty-six years later it seems consumers have fallen in love with, and become addicted to, a technology they probably will wish they could have abandoned.
“And it’s not just pigeons— have you seen any sparrows or parrots around, since these towers started springing up?” K. Pazhaniappan, Secretary, New Madras Racing Pigeon Association (43)
Personally, I cringe when I see men wearing live cell phones or other communication devices tethered to their trousers’ belts wrapped around their waist, all the time constantly sending DNA-damaging EMFs/RFs into their inner organs, especially targeting their testicles.
Another huge NO-NO for men is when they carry their live cell phones or iPhones inside their shirt pockets next to their heart and lungs! Even if they never smoked tobacco, they probably will wind up with some form of lung cancer and heart disease.
Nothing prompts me more about approaching a young woman than when I see a live cell phone parked inside her bra to tell her what she’s doing to her “tatas” [1], i.e., “cooking” them! However, I don’t because they’d think me “off the wall.”
If we didn’t take Rachel Carson’s work seriously and implement her admonitions, please consider Dr. Russell’s works as the “gold standard” regarding the hazards of 5G and all man-made electromagnetic frequencies constantly bathing us in an “Electrosmog” environment we have very little control over.
Note: This writer cannot vouch for any product on the above site. I list the webpage as a reference only for those affected TI individuals to do their research for themselves, but not depend upon my or others recommendations.
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
This article examines whether proximity to cellular phone towers has an impact
on residential property values and the extent of any impact. First, a survey approach is used to examine how residents perceive living near cellular phone base stations (CPBSs) and how residents evaluate the impacts of CPBSs.
Next, a market study attempts to confirm the perceived value impacts reported in the survey by analyzing actual property sales data. A multiple regression analysis in a hedonic pricing framework is used to measure the price impact of proximity to CPBSs. Both the survey and market sales analysis find that CPBSs have a negative impact on the prices of houses in the study areas.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. – A bill that would bring 5G wireless technology to Tennessee was passed by the senate.
It passed through the state senate on Wednesday with minimal resistance.
The legislation would allow the construction of cell phone towers much smaller than the ones currently providing 4G speeds to Tennessee cell phone owners.
5G is the next step in mobile cell phone speeds and the bill’s sponsor, state senator Bill Ketron, said it could increase data speeds up to one hundred times current speeds.
“There’s going to have to be smaller cells and shorter distances in order for that data to travel,” said senator Ketron. “It’s too much data to get it to the big tower. So, that’s what the 5G does across our state.”
However, Senator Lee Harris raised some concerns about about a maximum fee municipalities can charge wireless carriers who contract to build the infrastructure.
“It does give me pause that we would intervene with these negotiations and set a price or set a cap to a price,” said senator Harris. “Previously, city and counties could enter into open negotiation with big industry and a price could be determined as a result of those negotiations.”
Ketron said he believes implementing the infrastructure will not take much time and Tennesseans could start seeing 5G speeds as early as 2019.
5g And Health, 5g And Health Care, 5g And Health Concerns, 5g And Health Effects, 5g Australia Health, 5g Causing Health Problems, 5g Cell Towers Health, 5g Dangerous To Health, 5g E-health, 5g Frequency And Health, 5g Health, 5g Health Applications, 5g Health Care, 5g Health Concerns, 5g Health Effects, 5g Health Experiment, 5g Health Hazards, 5g Health Impacts, 5g Health Implications, 5g Health Issues
A mum has removed her children from school over fears the WiFi in the building was making them sick.
Alisa Keane from Downpatrick, Co Down , was dealing with recurring health problems with her sons, James, Conn and Dara.
They suffered severe headaches, nausea and problems with flagging and erratic concentration when in class but the symptoms vanished after spending an hour or two at home.
Alisa, 45, a trained teacher and communications expert, told Belfast Live: “I was very concerned about them. The issues seemed more pronounced with James who is the oldest, but all three boys were struggling with the same problems.
“When James told me he just couldn’t think in school I was really concerned. He said he could only think straight when he was at home.
“This was from a very bright boy who loved to learn, he loved to participate but he was really struggling. He was even getting annoyed with his class mates when they chatted because it broke his concentration and he was feeling generally irritated. But once he was home, the fog lifted and he was able to get down to his work happily.
“But he often felt nauseous and had a runny nose from an inflammatory problem which took longer to ease off and by the time it did, he’d be back in class and the problem would start again.
“Their dad Mark and I noticed a pattern had developed and the only difference between their surroundings in school and home was that we had no WiFi at home, we use the Ethernet which is hard wired.
“I started researching to see if it was possible that radio frequency radiation, the RF/EMF that delivers WiFi to us, could be an issue and I learned that in their little primary school they had two industrial sized routers for 23 iPads.
“The more I researched the more concerned I became. I kept thinking about James telling us that he just couldn’t think straight in school.
“I discovered Lloyds of London had dropped their insurance cover for WiFi use, and then discovered shockingly that the World Health Organisation International Agency for Research on Cancer classified wireless WiFi radiation as a Group 2B ‘Possible Human Carcinogen’.
“Then they outlined how children’s bodies absorb wireless radiation deeper into their bodies than adults.
“And what Dr Victoria Dunckley said worried me immensely. She explained WiFi in a classroom is constant, occurring all day every day, because signals are emitted by the access hubs even when the devices are not in use.
“She explains that the signals produced are also much stronger than those produced by your average home WiFi hub because the amount of bandwidth required to accommodate a large number of users.
“And in a school setting, multiple devices tend to be in use at once, which she says causes EMFs to reverberate and magnify one another.
“On 26 May 2017 I hand delivered a letter to the principal, including 20 scientific studies and reports on the adverse health effects from WiFi and wireless radiation.
“In the letter Mark and I asked for the WiFi in the school to be turned off, we asked that we receive the school’s risk assessment for WiFi emitting devices and associated equipment.
“We also asked for their risk assessments for asbestos and lead and the Certificate of Indemnity from the schools insurance provider and underwriters confirming that any damages or adverse health effects from WiFi/wireless radiation were covered.
“A couple of weeks later the principal, wrote to us stating: ‘As an employee of CCMS and in this capacity, I have made all reasonable enquiries into your request and have decided to continue to use WiFi in school.”
“Mark and I offered to pay to have the Ethernet installed in the school at our expense but it was turned down.”
A Freedom of Information request revealed that Tim Matchett, Head of Managed Services at C2k which is part of the Education Authority, confirmed that after contacting colleagues, contractors and staff within the wider EA, no risk assessment in relation to WiFi was held on file.
Alisa explained: “We discussed with the boys what we thought we should do to see if removing them from the school building would help. They were open to the idea and trusted us.
“So we took the boys out of school as a precaution. Their health and welfare is the responsibility of their parents, myself and Mark. We won’t take any risks with that especially when the risk of WiFi is unnecessary.
“Within one week we noticed a vast difference in their health. Their headaches and nausea were gone, the runny nose and what appeared as allergy symptoms cleared up and they were all able to concentrate and focus.
“What they learned went in and stayed in. They were happy and healthy and that has not changed in the last year.
“We arranged play dates with their school friends and because as brothers, there are only three and a half years between them, they play together too. They go swimming and to Jiu Jitsu together and are very content.
“To be honest I was amazed by the difference in their health and even more so because it improved so quickly.
“So I have become their teacher and it’s working out very well. It is not something I expected to do but I had to put their health first. Our hunch that they were sensitive to the WiFi in their school building appears to be correct and I know other parents who have concerns about the exposure.
“It has been deeply disappointing to know that the school and the CCMS did not act, did not accept our offer to pay for a different system and continue to have pupils exposed. It was just not a risk we wanted to take.”
Alisa said she was concerned about a number of potential dangers now associated with WiFi exposure including the :
The modern era that we live in has become so advanced in technology that has undoubtedly created an addiction among the people. Let us remind ourselves that we have become totally dependent on technology like electronics, electricity and satellites that have left us indeed vulnerable. But is this technology making us dumber? Is it stopping evolution? Are we allowing our natural creativity to be destroyed by technology? What is the future that we look forward to if artificial intelligence takes over the human brain?
Doug Tompkins, the co-founder of retail brands, The North Face and Esprit, believes technology has enslaved us and is destroying the very health of the planet on which all species depend. According to him, “The computer is a mechanism for acceleration, it accelerates economic activity and this is eating up the world. It’s eating up resources, it’s processing, it’s manufacturing, it’s distributing, it’s consuming. That’s what the computer’s real work does and it does that 24/7, 365 days a year, non-stop just to satisfy our own narrow needs.”
Today, we seem to be too immersed in a system where cell phones are a necessity just to be around or to even function! But do we understand the implications of the electromagnetic waves it emits? Are we aware of the sleep issues that are created due to the light from the screen of monitors and smart phones? The release of melatonin in the brain is blocked by this light giving it a message to stay awake eventually leading to nervous exhaustion. The extensive use of technology is going to pose serious problems in the long run which we do not realise while we are just convenience oriented.
The number of our daily exchanges of emails, phone calls, messages and photographs these days was unimaginable just a few years ago. The important point to be affirmed here is that laptops and tablet computers are another primary source of radiation. These devices generate three different harmful radiation — extremely low frequency radiation, radio frequency radiation and heat radiation.
The fact before us is that high-tech devices, including our mobile phone, laptop, tablet and wearable tech like the Apple Watch, all generate a near-continuous source of unseen pollution that can be stressful and toxic to your cells.
The most common effect is heat generation (though non-thermal biological harm has also been demonstrated), which can alter the characteristics of various body tissues depending on the amount of radiation present and its ability to penetrate the body.
Tissue damage can promote the cellular mutations and increase your long-term risk of developing cancer. It is advisable to avoid Bluetooth headsets too as these pose serious radiation hazards due to the fact that they act as mini wireless antennas that blast electromagnetic fields directly into the ear and head.
I believe we must address the situation more seriously since scientists are shedding more light on discoveries about health hazards caused by the radio-active waves emitted by cell phones.
WHO has also warned about the increased risk of cancer and tumours in the brain and around the ear in addition to the change in the behavioural pattern of individuals due to the disturbance in the brain activity caused by these waves.
There’s no question that mobile phones and computers offer many conveniences and have made our lives easier in countless ways.
The convenience factor may outweigh the worry of radiation for many. But the need to be aware of the hidden dangers and understanding the urgency to take adequate measures to control it is absolutely necessary to keep civilization from crashing.
(Contributed by Agnivesh Jyotiraditya Kannankara, who has authored a book on Shillong)
Has your community been affected by the erection of or an application to erect a cell mast?If it hasn’t, judging by the flood of applications by cell companies to erect cell masts in residential areas, your community will be affected sooner rather than later.
With 5G on the horizon, there will be a massive rollout of cell mast infrastructure, and many more communities will be affected. It is an onslaught.
Having just been through the public participation process for a cell mast application in my neighbourhood, I have first-hand experience of how flawed the process is. The odds are stacked against citizens trying to challenge such applications. It also appears that corrupt activity is at play.
I have followed many objections by other communities to cell mast applications. A few have been successfully fought off but most are eventually passed.
If cell companies don’t succeed with such an application, they simply try again at a later date. Cellphone companies have vast resources, and most cases that are challenged are dragged out by the cell companies in the legal system until the affected residents are too exhausted to continue the fight or they have run out of money.
I believe the only way we citizens will put a stop to this once and for all is by challenging the constitutionality of erecting cell masts in residential areas. We have a much-vaunted Bill of Rights that enshrines the right to a safe environment. Let’s put this to the test and see if our rights are indeed protected by our constitution.
To do this, we need to fight smart. We need to get organised and fight cell companies as one group. If we continue as we are in silos, all communities fighting the applications will be picked off one by one by cell companies and they’ll force their masts into our living spaces.
We need to create a “war chest” that can be used by any community fighting an application for a cell mast in their area. This can be funded by donations, fund-raisers, crowdfunding and with the assistance of interested NGOs.
Cell companies must be made aware that they will be made to go to court for each application and that this will eat into their profits. If this group becomes too big to be ignored, we will be able to influence policy decisions and even interrogate political parties about their cell technology policies before voting for them. We could even organise to port from a particular cell company en masse if they continue to roll out their infrastructure at the expense of citizens.
In all the cell mast applications that I have seen, the most common objection was on health grounds. Other frequently raised objections were environmental degradation, reduction in property values and impairment of views.
On the health issue, the cell companies simply say they follow the World Health Organization guidelines. The WHO relies on the International Commission on Non-ionising Radiation to investigate the health effects of low-level electromagnetic fields, which cell masts/phones (among other devices) emit.
The problem with this is that the commission is compromised and is an industry-loyal NGO that is seemingly answerable to no one. There are serious conflicts of interest, and its members seem more concerned about shielding cell companies from criticism than with the negative health effects of this technology. As one example, this is a quote by the head of the commission, Dr Emile van Deventer, in 2007: “Industry is not interested in your health, they want the network to work properly.”
They simply fob off any criticism of the industry and ignore the latest research. This allows the WHO to glibly claim “there is no research that proves any known adverse health effect”, without producing a shred of evidence for this astounding claim.
Let’s call this what it is – a blatant lie. This mantra is repeated by cell companies and municipalities to squash any health concerns raised. (The City of Cape Town has even stated it would no longer consider any objections based on health risks.) In fact, the same modus operandi has been used by the oil, tobacco, GMO, pharmaceutical and other industries.
They introduce scientific uncertainty by creating the illusion that there’s doubt about prevailing research. They never have to be proved right – they have only to maintain the illusion. This is despite scientists doing the research all agreeing there is a serious concern. This is fraudulent and borders on criminal negligence.
Many concerned scientists have tried to approach both the WHO and the commission to impress upon them the dangers of the mass rollout of cell technology infrastructure and that the information the WHO is disseminating stands in stark contrast to the research results. There is ample evidence that radio-frequency radiation (RF) causes an increase in the risk of cancer, infertility, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders (like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s), electrohypersensitivity, DNA changes, heart disease, immune system deficiency, and more.
Many long-term studies on the effect of RF on humans are coming to completion and the results are being published. Each new result seems to be more damning than the last.
We can no longer rely on the information from the commission alone to formulate our health or cell infrastructure policy. We need to force a review of all the available research from all sources and make an informed decision on the dangers (or not) of low-level electromagnetic fields generated by cell masts.
If there are no health risks, as cell companies claim, then surely they would welcome such a review, as it would vindicate their stance? In fact, they should even be willing to fund such a review. They won’t because they know full well that there are serious health risks associated with the technology.
As proof of this, British Telecom warned in its 2017 annual report: “We cannot provide absolute assurance that research in the future won’t establish links between radio frequency emissions and health risks.” What it is really saying is: “We can’t hide the truth forever.”
We need to challenge the cell mast policy in the Constitutional Court. We need to ask the court for the following relief:
* An order that a commission of inquiry be set up to review all research relating to the health risks of cell mast emissions. The results of the inquiry must be used to formulate cell mast infrastructure policy.
* An order for a moratorium on the rollout of cell mast infrastructure until the commission of inquiry has published its findings.
* An order that no cell masts may be erected in residential areas, especially taking into account the most vulnerable citizens – children and the aged. No cell masts near crèches, schools or old-age homes.
* An order that anyone who “hosts” a cell mast on their property will be held jointly liable for all medical claims that arise from exposure to cell mast emissions.
* An order that a commission of inquiry or a panel of experts must meet every two years to review new science relating to cell masts and to update all related policies accordingly.
* An order that cell masts in residential areas must have 50% + 1 community support.
* An order that all cell masts that fall foul of the new guidelines be removed.
If you share my concerns about the massive rollout of cell mast infrastructure without heeding the available and alarming health risks associated with that, then please visit our website at www.naacm.co.za and register your details.
The plan is to create a one-stop shop where objectors can find the necessary information for their challenge. This will be used as a contact list for all further updates on this campaign.
* Main is co-founder of National Alliance Against Cell Masts.
EMF Inspection, Assessments and Remediation Solutions
There has been increasing concern about the presence of dangerous levels of electromagnetic fields (EMF), especially in residential properties. With the increasing density of housing units (densely packed condominiums) in urban areas, the multiplication of EMF sources (electrical transformers, cell-phone towers, electrical transmission lines) and the plethora of household electrical devices (TVs, computers, wireless home networks) the levels of EMF that people regularly come into contact with has greatly increased. There is also concern that the explosion in the use of cell phones is adding to this growth.
Most disturbing of all is the thought that these fields cause increased levels of cancer. There have been many news reports about this issue, dove-tailing with a large number of governmental and international health studies (EPA, World Health Organization, UK Sage Study).
EMF Real EstateSurvey/Inspection
House and property that is occupied takes 2-3.5hrs ($425)
House and property that is unoccupied takes 1-2.5hrs ($225)
Before you by property that has cell towers within a quarter of a mile, transformers on poles within 50ft, electrical sub stations, or electrical transmission lines near the property…etc. Takes about 1.5hrs ($150)
The Gigahertz Solutions equipment we use for detection and measurement are specially designed for Certified Electromagnetic Radiation Specialists. It is state of the art, the most sensitive available, certified and calibrated. When electrical or plumbing repair is required we can direct you to experienced and licensed contractors that are EMF aware.
These readings are plotted on to an outline drawing of your property and house. The data gathered is compared to other common electric sources within your house.
Many of EMF Solutions can be put in place during the assessment at no additional cost.
We can help create a low EMF and RF environment in your property. The recipe to a successful outcome is following a systematic protocol in assessment, designing the mitigation plan if necessary, and verifying the achievement of the design goals. The steps for a low EMF/RF assessment, consultation and possible development of a mitigation plan consist of:
Assessment of low and high frequency background levels present on the property
Assessment of low and high frequency levels present in the building
Develop and design of a possible mitigation according to your benchmarks for sensitive areas
Consult on prudent placement in all sensitive areas
Design shielding concepts as indicated
Retain a qualified electrician to verify proper electrical installationand grounding system if indicated
Shielding implementation by qualified craftsmen
Measurements to confirm compliance to your benchmarks
What about cartoon characters smoking cigarettes?
A mum has removed her children from school over fears the WiFi in the building was making them sick.
Has your community been affected by the erection of or an application to erect a cell mast?If it hasn’t, judging by the flood of applications by cell companies to erect cell masts in residential areas, your community will be affected sooner rather than later.
There has been increasing concern about the presence of dangerous levels of electromagnetic fields (EMF), especially in residential properties. With the increasing density of housing units (densely packed condominiums) in urban areas, the multiplication of EMF sources (electrical transformers, cell-phone towers, electrical transmission lines) and the plethora of household electrical devices (TVs, computers, wireless home networks) the levels of EMF that people regularly come into contact with has greatly increased. There is also concern that the explosion in the use of cell phones is adding to this growth.
