radiation – emfTESTS – Home Inspections

5G Deployment and Public Policy

Anne 0 Comments May 21, 2024May 21, 2024 EMF-home-inspection

As the deployment of 5G technology accelerates around the world, it raises important questions about public policy, community health, and environmental concerns. This article explores the current landscape of 5G deployment, the regulatory response to emerging concerns, and the role of activism in shaping public policy surrounding this transformative technology.

Global Deployment of 5G

5G technology is being rolled out in a phased approach globally, with many developed nations leading the way. These countries are investing heavily in infrastructure that supports 5G to enhance connectivity and drive economic growth. However, the deployment is not uniform, with urban areas typically prioritized over rural regions, leading to a digital divide that policymakers are struggling to address.

Public and Regulatory Responses

The rollout of 5G has prompted significant public and regulatory scrutiny:

Health and Safety Regulations: In response to health concerns, several countries have updated their radiation safety standards to incorporate the specific needs posed by 5G frequencies. For example, the European Union has adopted stringent guidelines for electromagnetic radiation, balancing technological advancement with health protection.
Environmental Concerns: The environmental impact of erecting thousands of new antennas has also been a hot topic. Regulatory bodies are requiring more comprehensive environmental impact assessments before approving new installations, especially in ecologically sensitive areas.
Privacy and Security: With 5G’s enhanced data transmission capabilities, concerns about data privacy and cybersecurity have prompted stricter regulations and standards for data protection.

Impact of Activism and Advocacy

Activism plays a crucial role in the 5G dialogue. Community groups, often skeptical of 5G’s safety, have been vocal in demanding more transparent research into the potential health effects. Their efforts have led to temporary halts and reevaluations of 5G projects in several cities:

Community Involvement: Advocates for community involvement insist that local populations should have a say in whether and how 5G infrastructure is deployed in their areas.
Legal Challenges: In some cases, activists have taken legal action to stop or delay the deployment of 5G, citing inadequate studies on health impacts and environmental concerns.

Future Policy Directions

Looking forward, the regulation of 5G technology is expected to evolve as more becomes known about its implications. Policy decisions will likely focus on:

Balancing Growth and Health: Ensuring that the economic benefits of 5G do not overshadow potential health risks.
Inclusive Deployment Strategies: Addressing the digital divide by promoting equal access to 5G technology across both urban and rural areas.
Sustainability Practices: Encouraging the adoption of sustainable practices in the deployment of 5G infrastructure to mitigate environmental impacts.

Conclusion

The deployment of 5G technology presents a significant policy challenge, balancing the promise of enhanced connectivity with the need for safety, privacy, and environmental sustainability. As 5G becomes more entrenched in our daily lives, public policies must evolve to reflect the complex interplay between technological advancement and societal welfare.

Our team at emfTESTS offers comprehensive electromagnetic field (EMF) testing and is recognized as one of the leaders in the field of electromagnetic field (EMF) mitigation in the United States.

We are committed to perfection, and we are able to identify and assist you in mitigating six different forms of electromagnetic fields (EMFs). These EMFs include electric fields, dirty electricity, magnetic fields, wireless radiation, and even artificial light and geopathic stress!

However, why would you not want to employ an electromagnetic field (EMF) mitigation professional and have your house, office, or anticipated future residence inspected for electro-pollution?

EMF mitigation professionals like emfTESTS and their team employ professional-level meters, which are not the more affordable amateur-level meters. These meters are quite costly, but they provide findings that are correct according to scientific standards.
This indicates that emfTESTS is able to readily determine which sources of electro-pollution in the vicinity of your house are accountable for the majority of the electromagnetic field exposure that your family experiences. Which tower is this, a 4G or a 5G one? Does it belong to you as a WiFi router? Is there more to it than that?)
The emfTESTS team is unique because they also consider the light environment in your house and can assist you in selecting lighting solutions that are more beneficial to your health. Although artificial light is frequently disregarded, it is a significant kind of electro-pollution.
Shielded Healing will walk you through the solutions, and it will not leave you with a one-pager and a great deal more concern than you had before you took the EMF survey.
In the event that you are being subjected to significant quantities of wireless radiation from your neighbors, local cell towers, or any other “outside sources,” Shielded Healing can assist you in shielding your bedroom from the harmful effects of these sources. There is a strong possibility that this is one of the most beneficial purchases you will ever make in order to make your house a healthier place to live.

Anne 0 Comments May 16, 2024May 16, 2024 EMF-home-inspection

5G technology

As 5G technology proliferates globally, concerns about its health implications have become a central point of discussion among scientists, healthcare providers, and the public. This article examines the potential health risks associated with 5G technology, compares these risks to previous generations of cellular technology, and discusses current research and expert opinions on the matter.

Understanding 5G and Its Exposure Levels

5G technology uses higher frequency bands than previous generations, which include the millimeter wave (mmWave) spectrum. These high-frequency waves can transmit large amounts of data faster and with lower latency but have a shorter range and lower penetration capabilities compared to lower-frequency waves. The exposure to these high frequencies has raised concerns about potential health impacts, especially given their novel application in consumer devices and infrastructure.

Potential Health Risks

The primary concern with 5G exposure revolves around the potential for increased radiation absorption in human tissues:

Skin Absorption: Early studies suggest that mmWave frequencies tend to be absorbed by the skin’s surface layers, potentially affecting the skin and eyes due to their superficial penetration.
Thermal Effects: There is concern about the thermal effects of prolonged exposure to high-frequency waves, which can cause tissue heating and may lead to adverse health effects.
Systemic Impact: While the long-term systemic impacts of 5G are still under study, preliminary research indicates potential effects on immune and neurological function.

Comparative Analysis with Previous Generations

While previous cellular network generations (like 3G and 4G) have been studied more extensively, the shift to higher frequencies with 5G necessitates new research paradigms. Past studies on 3G and 4G highlighted concerns over possible links to conditions such as headaches, cognitive dysfunction, and even cancer, but the evidence was not conclusive. The higher frequency and intensity of 5G exposure call for renewed scrutiny and updated methodologies to ensure public safety.

Current Research and Expert Opinions

Ongoing research into 5G’s health effects is mixed, with some studies indicating minimal risk while others suggest potential harm. Institutions like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) are closely monitoring these developments. The WHO has categorized all radiofrequency radiation (which includes mobile phone frequencies) as a possible human carcinogen (Group 2B), indicating that there is a potential risk that needs further investigation.

Regulatory and Health Advisory Responses

Regulatory bodies worldwide are updating their guidelines to address potential risks associated with 5G:

Safety Standards: Updated safety standards are being implemented, which consider the specific absorption rate (SAR) values of devices and infrastructure.
Public Health Guidelines: Health authorities are developing guidelines that recommend minimizing exposure, especially for vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant women.

Regulatory Capture: Kennedy highlighted the extensive control that large corporations, especially within the telecommunications sector, exert over regulatory bodies such as the FCC and FDA. This control results in lax enforcement and regulations that favor industry interests over public health [5].
Media Influence: Significant advertising spending by telecommunications giants effectively silences negative media coverage about EMF pollution, leading to a lack of public awareness and understanding of the associated health risks [5].
Health Risks and Public Ignorance: There is a strong scientific consensus about the harmful effects of EMF exposure, including cancer, neurological disorders, and immune system disruption. However, the public remains largely unaware or dismissive of these risks, partly due to media manipulation and the convenience provided by wireless technologies [5].
Litigation and Advocacy: Kennedy discusses ongoing legal battles aimed at challenging regulatory failures and pushing for stricter EMF exposure guidelines. These include suits against both the government and private corporations for failing to protect public health [5].
Policy and Personnel Changes: The summit emphasized the need for sweeping changes in the staffing and policy direction of regulatory agencies to combat the issue of regulatory capture. This includes replacing industry-affiliated personnel with experts who prioritize public health [5].
Global Impact and Environmental Concerns: The unchecked proliferation of telecommunications infrastructure, including satellites, poses significant threats not only to human health but also to wildlife and ecosystems. There is a call for comprehensive environmental assessments and stricter global regulations [5].
Medical Gaslighting: Individuals reporting symptoms related to EMF exposure often face dismissal and skepticism from the medical community, a phenomenon Kennedy identifies as a form of medical gaslighting. This systemic issue needs addressing through better education and awareness in the healthcare industry [5].

These insights highlight the critical need for regulatory reform, increased public engagement, and stronger advocacy to mitigate the impacts of EMF pollution and ensure that technological advancements do not come at the expense of public health and ecological integrity.

Conclusion

The health implications of 5G technology are a complex and evolving area of study. As this technology becomes more widespread, it is crucial that rigorous, independent research continues to monitor its health impacts. Public policy and health advisories will need to adapt based on these findings to safeguard public health while harnessing the benefits of 5G’s advancements.

Anne 0 Comments May 1, 2024May 1, 2024 EMF-home-inspection

There has been a lot of talk about 5G radiation in the Us, for those who are not aware of it 5G means fifth-generation technology, and many phone companies have promised it would be up to 100 times faster than 4G and 2,000 times faster than 3G. 5G is being touted as a necessary step to the ‘internet of things’, which is system of interrelated, internet-connected objects that are able to collect and transfer data over a wireless network without human intervention.

In the US, most people believe that the Federal Communications Commission carefully assesses the health risks of these technologies before approving them. However, in testimony before Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, the Federal Communications Commission admitted to having conducted no 5G safety studies. 5G radiofrequency radiation makes use of millimeter waves and microwave radiation. While 4G frequencies can reach 6 GHz, 5G exposes biological life to pulsed signals that range from 30 GHz to 100 GHz. The general public has never before been subjected to such high frequencies for extended periods of time.

5G leads to a massive increase in mandatory exposure to wireless radiation and will massively increase microwave and millimeter-wave radiation in our environment. More than 230 scientists from more than 40 countries have already expressed their concerns regarding the increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices before the additional 5G roll-out. EMF is short for electromagnetic fields and as for whether EMF is harmful to people, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is part of the World Health Organization, admitted that EMF’s are “possibly carcinogenic to humans”. Scientists who reject 5G says health effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, and genetic damages.

EMF 0 Comments April 11, 2021April 11, 2021 Cell Phones Safty EMF-home-inspection Safty and Remediation

EHT recommends eliminating sources of EMF radiation inside school buildings by the installation of corded/wired (instead of wireless) internet/phone/tech connections. Corded/wired connections will significantly reduce hourly and overall exposures to students, teachers and staff.

ROUTINES IN THE CLASSROOM

At start of class, remind students that cell phones and Personal Digital Devices (PDD) must be powered off and stored. Regularly remind students about phones and wireless PDD: 1. distance devices away from body and
If cell phones are needed for photos or video remind students to turn transmitting antennas off: Select “airplane mode” and disable all wireless antennas including Cellular, Wi-Fii, Mobile hotspot, Mobile data, Siri, Bluetooth and Location.
Post policy and best practices signs in every classroom and prominently at room entrances.

CURRICULUM PLANNING

When curricula requires internet connectivity, limit it to specific times rather than interspersed throughout class. For example, curricula should not require students to use phones to look up things during class. Instead, have a plan that includes time when students organize their research questions and, subsequently, a separate time when students research online.
When internet or other electronic connections are needed, use hardwire connections (cords/cables/wires/adapters) for all equipment (personal computer, any size electronic screen, printer, audio speakers, headphones, microphone, smartboard, printer, mouse, keyboard, and other devices and accessories).
If hardwire connections are not available in the school, minimize use of cloud and other wireless network services and instead use applications and content that are pre-downloaded onto devices.
Download and install files for curriculum prior to students’ use. This will eliminate the need for Wi-Fi during class.
Teach students to turn OFF wireless antennas when not in use (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Data, Cellular) and to select Airplane Mode for their personal devices including on cell phones, laptops, and other wireless devices. Note that students may need to go to Settings to fully disable Wi-Fi and Bluetooth*.
Store laptop carts outside of the classroom, and avoid recharging laptops near students/staff.
Instead of virtual reality “field trips,” show movies and video in class on a large screen.

* Wi-Fi “OFF when not in use” will still result in radiation exposures to students and staff during Wi-Fi use and continuously from WLAN access points. EHT recommends the installation of wired networks.

distance devices

COMMUNITY EDUCATION

Regularly schedule parent education sessions about safer use of technology, e.g.:Strategies and practical advice on how to minimize health risks of cell phones, screens, and wireless digital devices
Hands-on workshops that explain and demonstrate how to hardwire home electronics and create a low-EMF computer workstation.
Regularly hold discussion forums about strategies to address the challenges of parenting in the digital age.
Hold student forums about how to reduce radiation, reduce eye strain, and minimize adverse psychosocial impact.

SCHOOL POLICY

Create and regularly update policies for cell phone and digital device use in classrooms that includes medical recommendations for children’s health and safety related to eyes, posture, addiction, and radiation. For continuous improvement, policies might include reporting and accountability measures.
Institute a ban on personal cell phones and personal hotspot devices. Prohibit use of all internet-connected devices in classrooms unless during supervised use for specific instructional purpose. Such a policy may help prevent students from rushing through schoolwork to go online for gaming or other non-school purposes.

EMF 0 Comments April 28, 2020April 28, 2020 AC/DC Magnetic Fields Cell Towers Electromagnetic Frequencies EMF-home-inspection Nashville Tennessee Home inspections Real Estate Inspection

5G antennas are popping up all across the United States, and a significant number of people are growing increasingly concerned over the long-term health effects of the high-speed communications technology. Unfortunately, it appears as though their trepidations are falling on deaf ears.

5G technology is alluring in that it offers download speeds up to 30 times faster than 4G. It is touted as the technology necessary for self-driving vehicles. Gaia.com elaborates,

The difference between 4G and 5G in terms of gigahertz, the unit of alternating current (AC) or electromagnetic (EM) waves that affect the transmission speeds of devices, is significant. 5G technology promises radio millimeter bands in the 30 to 300 GHz range, while 4G tops out at around 6GHz. When applied to video latency, this translates to speeds up to 60 to 120 times faster.

Lawmakers are anxious to see the new technology rolled out in their cities. CBS News reports Sacramento was one of the first cities in the nation to launch 5G under the leadership of Mayor Darrell Steinberg in 2017, but residents have voiced concerns over the public safety of the new technology.

Sacramento parents Aaron and Hannah McMahon, who have two young daughters, told CBS they had a 5G cell antenna on a pole just outside of their home. According to Aaron, experts have told him that his family is virtually “living in a microwave” with the tower so close to their residence.

“It’s scary, it’s a hard situation to be in,” Hannah McMahon said. “They can’t tell me that something that’s fairly new, and relatively untested, is not gonna be harmful in 10-15 years.”

And the McMahons are not alone. Homeowners in cities throughout the country are leading petitions to stop 5G construction in their neighborhoods, citing public health fears.

In an effort to assuage concerns, Sacramento commissioned an independent study on the safety of the 5G towers led by University of California Davis Professor Jerrold Bushberg.

Bushberg claims the towers emit “very low levels of exposure” and therefore do not pose a health threat. He adds the FCC sets guidelines for exposure to cell signals, and the exposure from the 5G antennas is well within the safe level.

But skeptical Americans do not necessarily find relief in that assessment. After all, the Food and Drug Administration frequently approves drugs later proven to cause serious long-term health consequences.

It’s worth noting the former chair of the FCC, Tom Wheeler, who was behind the big push for 5G technology, was also the former head of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA), the vast telecoms lobby group. Current FCC Chairman Ajit Pai is also a proponent of 5G technology, and has even dismissed claims that the technology could interfere with weather observations, despite the studies in support of those observations. Pai has close ties to the telecommunications industry as a former Verizon lawyer. Is there a possible conflict of interest there?

While Dr. Bushberg could be completely correct in his assessment of 5G, the science is anything but settled. More than 200 scientists in more than 40 countries have warned about 5G’s health risks and have asked the European Union to follow “Resolution 1815 of the Council of Europe” — which asks the Council of Europe to take all measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields and create an independent task force to reassess the health risks of the exposure. Those scientists declared in the “5G Appeal” to the EU:

We, the undersigned scientists, recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry. 5G will substantially increase exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) … and has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.

They explain that because the technology is poorly transmitted through solid materials, it will require new antennas nearly every 10 to 12 houses in urban areas, significantly increasing EMF exposure. According to opponents of 5G, some potential effects of this exposure can include cancer, genetic damages, reproductive issues, cognitive and neurological disorders, to name just a few.

The National Toxicology Program (NTP) conducted a $25 million U.S. study and found a significant increase in the incidence of brain and heart cancer in animals exposed to EMF below the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines followed by most nations and significantly lower than the levels created by 5G technology.

Dr. Ron Powell is a retired U.S. Government physicist who has worked with this technology in the military, and has been an outspoken critic of 5G technology. He has claimed it “would irradiate everyone, including the most vulnerable to harm from radiofrequency radiation: pregnant women, unborn children, young children … the elderly, the disabled, and the chronically ill…. It would set a goal of irradiating all environments.”

While 5G has certainly not been “proven” to be harmful to the general population, since it is just now being implemented, it appears that concerns over 5G’s health risks are not unfounded. But what has been Sacramento’s response to concerned citizens such as the McMahons? It will make sure the FCC rules are followed and the cells are aesthetically pleasing, CBS Sacramento reports.

Emf Sensitivity Test, Emf Shield Test, Emf Test, Emf Test Meter, Emf Test Power Line, Emf Test Results, Emf Test Standard, Emf Testing Certification, Shungite Emf Test, Test Emf Your Home

EMF 0 Comments June 7, 2019June 7, 2019 Cell Towers

By John Vibes

Sprint was forced to shut down a cellphone tower that was located outside of a school in the suburbs of Sacramento, California. The tower location became a topic of controversy in recent years, as numerous children in the school have developed cancer.

At least 4 students at a San Joaquin County elementary school have gotten cancer since the cell tower was installed, and after a while, many of the parents began pointing the finger at Sprint.

Monica Ferrulli, the mother of one of the children diagnosed with cancer, says that her son’s doctors have indicated that this specific type of cancer is caused by something the patient was exposed to in their environment.

“We had a doctor tell us that it’s 100 percent environmental, the kind of tumor that he has,” Ferrulli told CBS Sacramento.

“It is classified as a possible carcinogen. That tells us that there is some evidence out there,” Ferrulli said. “We’re not naive to the fact that there could be other components out there — other environmental influences… but the bottom line that we feel in regards to this tower is it doesn’t belong there… if there’s any indications that it’s unsafe,” Ferrulli added.

Joe Prime, another parent who now has a child battling cancer as well, says that the towers need to go before more people are exposed.

“My son missed growing up with his friends. My son lost all of his hair. It’s not something that I wish on anybody to watch their child go through what our children have gone through,” Prime said.

Initially, the school district was hesitant to call off their deal with Sprint, but Prime and Ferrulli were able to apply enough legal pressure on them to get the tower removed.

Parents were also upset that Sprint provided the school district with a kickback of $2,000 per month for allowing the tower on their property.

<span<br /> style=”display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden;<br /> line-height: 0;” data-mce-type=”bookmark”<br /> class=”mce_SELRES_start”></span>

Experts say that regardless of federal standards, it is dangerous to have young children by in such close proximity to these devices on such a regular basis.

Eric Windheim, an electromagnetic radiation specialist, says that these frequencies can have an effect on the cells of children because they are still growing and developing.

“I wouldn’t send my kids there at all, it absolutely is dangerous. Children are still developing, and their cells are still being divided. It’s the worst possible time in their life to be exposed. Instead of only going 300 yards like regular Wi-Fi, Y-Max can go 30 miles,” he said.

Sprint network project manager Dharma Nordell told CBS News that three tests have shown the tower is operating 100 times below the federal limit. Nordell said that the tower was removed because of the concerns of the residents, but when asked if he believed that the tower was giving people cancer, he replied “Absolutely not. It is not a safety concern to the community but we do hear the community’s concerns, so we’re quickly working to relocate the tower.”

John Vibes is an author and journalist who takes a special interest in the counter culture, and focuses solutions-oriented approaches to social problems. He is also a host of The Free Your Mind Conference and The Free Thought Project Podcast. Read More stories by John Vibes

EMF 0 Comments February 28, 2019April 3, 2019 EMF-home-inspection

Fear of cellphone radiation effects on the human body is nothing new, and we are constantly warned about the possible consequences of regular exposure to wireless signals.

Skeptics say that none of the studies are conclusive so far. And the wireless industry is always ready to reassure the public that there’s no concrete link between cellphone exposure and health issues.

But with the current rollout of the much faster and more powerful 5G standard, will it put us at greater risk?

Related article: What is 5G all about anyway? Click here to read more about the ongoing 5G revolution.

What’s different about 5G anyway?

First, 5G operates on higher radio frequencies than older cellphone standards. While previous 1G, 2G, 3G and even 4G networks work between 700 MHz to 6 GHz frequencies, 5G works in the ultra-high 28 to 100 GHz frequencies (also known as the millimeter wave bands).

The good news is that these ultra-high frequencies allow for blazing fast data transfers (5G can wirelessly achieve 10 Gbps in theory, imagine that). These bands are less congested, too, with less interference from other wireless signals.

The bad news? These higher frequency waves can’t travel long distances nor pass well through objects. To compensate, antennas (mini cellular stations, really) will have to be installed every 500 feet on average. Soon, there will likely be a 5G antenna on every lamp post you see. This means our exposure to radio frequency radiation will be higher than ever.

Remember we’re not just dealing with cellular signals. We’re also constantly bombarded by radio frequency radiation from other appliances including Wi-Fi routers and Wi-Fi enabled gadgets.

Bonus: The future may get here faster than we think, as the world races toward 5G wireless technology. 5G will be faster, revolutionary and could even fight terrorism?

In this Komando on Demand podcast, Kim looks at why 5G is both astonishing and dangerous.

Radio frequencies and your health

So will this bombardment of radio radiation increase our health risks such as cancer and other ailments? One thing about cellphone radiation is that it’s low energy so it’s generally safer than high-energy radiation sources like X-rays.

However, past studies have certainly linked certain types of brain cancer and fertility problems to cellphone use. Although these are not conclusive, radio frequency radiation is linked to health issues like:

Brain cancer, tumors of the acoustic nerve (necessary for hearing and balance) and the salivary glands
Lower sperm counts and inactive, less mobile sperm
Headaches and effects on learning and memory, hearing, behavior and sleep

Some people also claim that they have EMF hypersensitivity and say exposure to radio frequency radiation trigger multiple symptoms like headaches, muscle aches and pain, rashes, insomnia and nosebleeds.

The FDA believes that the current scientific data does not show an “an association between exposure to radiofrequency from cell phones and adverse health outcomes” but it continuously reviews new studies and research that could prove this otherwise.

At this point, the FDA is basically saying that the current data suggest that the cellular industry’s radiofrequency safety limits are still acceptable for protecting our health.

However, on a related note, the FDA also admits that “extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields” are possibly carcinogenic to humans.

With so many cellphone users now, the age-old question of whether they can cause health problems really needs to be answered. Listen to this Komando on Demand podcast as Kim takes a deep dive into this extremely important topic.

Tap or click below to listen to this free Komando on Demand podcast!

How about 5G? Although there are no studies that link 5G and its millimeter wave band use to significant health risks (research will take time) yet, why risk it?There are various ways to limit your exposure to your cellphone’s radiation and it’s the least you can do to protect yourself from the potential dangers.

How to reduce cellphone exposure

Here are the factors that determine your exposure to cellphone radiation — your distance from the phone, the strength of the signal, and how long and how often you use the phone. Basically, the farther away the cellphone is from your body, the less the exposure.

Here are the key points to ponder:

Increase the distance between your cellphone and your body by using the speakerphone or a headset (Bluetooth headsets have weaker EMFs).
Opt to send text messages instead of calling.
If you’re streaming or downloading files with your phone, try to keep it away from your head and body.
Do not carry it in your pocket or directly on your body unless the phone is off.
Take off your headset when you’re not on call. In addition, I think this applies to music listening with wireless headphones too (AirPods, wireless earbuds, etc.)
Do not to sleep with your cellphone in your bed or near your head.

When are you most at risk?

It is also recommended that you limit your cellphone use when reception is weak. Your phone’s RF energy is stronger when your cellphone only shows one or two bars. If this is the case, try increasing the distance between you and the phone by using the speaker or a headset.

Here are situations when a cellphone’s RF signal is the strongest:

At the start of a call, when the phone is trying to connect to a cell tower
As mentioned, when a cellphone only has one or two bars
When in a moving car, bus or train (as the phone switches from one tower to another)
When you are streaming music or movies or downloading or sending large files

Furthermore, keeping cellphone calls short (use the speakerphone for longer conversations) and to not rely on gadgets that claim to shield or neutralize cellphone EMFs.

In related news, security flaws already found in 5G technology

Well, 5G is barely a few months old, and — no surprise — researchers are poking holes in its security. Purdue University and University of Iowa researchers discovered three vulnerabilities in 5G that can be used to track someone’s location, intercept phone calls and send fraudulent text messages.

Click or tap to find out about these 5G vulnerabilities.

Tag: radiation