“We recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry…RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.” — 2017 5G Scientific Appeal (signed by more than 180 scientists and doctors from 35 countries)
Nationwide, communities are being told by wireless companies that it is necessary to build “small cell” wireless facilities in neighborhoods on streetlight and utility poles in order to offer 5G, a new technology that will connect the Internet of Things (IoT). At the local, state, and federal level, new legislation and new zoning aim to streamline the installation of these 5G “small cell” antennas in public rights-of-way.
The radiation from small cells is not small: Wireless antennas emit microwaves — non-ionizing radiofrequency radiation — and essentially function as cell towers. Radiation emitted from small cells is expected to typically travel from 10 feet up to several hundred feet.
Millions of small cells to be built in front yards: The Federal Communications Commission estimates that millions of these wireless transmitters will be built in our rights-of-way, directly in front of our homes.
5G will add to — not replace — our current wireless technology: 5G will add in another layer of wireless radiation to our environment. 5G will not only utilize wireless frequencies already in use but also add in higher frequencies — submillimeter and millimeter waves — in order to transmit data at superfast speeds.
Community authority is overruled: Communities are being stripped of their right to make decisions about this new technology. ”Streamlining” means almost automatic approval. Public notice and public hearings are being eliminated. Even if every homeowner on the block opposes the antennas on their street, the opposition will be disregarded.
Scientists worldwide are calling for a halt to the 5G Roll-out: In 2017, over 180 scientists and doctors issued
a declaration calling for a moratorium on the increase of 5G cell antennas citing human health effects and impacts to wildlife.
Cumulative daily radiation exposure poses serious public health risks: Peer reviewed, published science indicates that exposures to wireless radiation can increase cancer risk and alter brain development and damage sperm. Most people are unaware that wireless technology was never tested for long-term safety, that children are more vulnerable and that the accumulated scientific evidence shows harm.
Decreased property values: Studies show property values drop up to 20% on homes near cell towers. Would you buy a home with a mini cell tower in the yard?
Read Research on Cellular Base Stations Near Homes
Microwave antennas in front yards present several worker and public safety issues: Unions have already filed comments that workers were injured, unaware they were working near transmitting antennas. How will HVAC workers, window washers, and tree cutters be protected? The heavy large equipment cabinets mounted on poles along our sidewalks also present new hazards. Cars run into utility poles, often, what then?
There is a safer alternative: Worldwide, many regions invest in safer and smarter fiber optic cabling all the way to each home, rather than antennas in front yards. Wired fiberoptic connections are safer, faster, more reliable, provide greater capacity, and are more cyber-secure.
www.ehtrust.org
GRAND RAPIDS, MICH. – The potential dangers of cell phone use is making headlines these days. A West Michigan company has created a device, it says will block harmful radiation.
The company is called Kids Armour. President and CEO, Ross Pope, believes the microchip technology is a must have, especially for parents.
“Cell phones collect a signal from a cell tower. The energy that it generates, creates radiation similar to that of radiation from transformers in neighborhoods, that we know cause cancer,” said Pope. “This is the same type of radiation that is affecting your body or children’s bodies.”
The Kids Armour device, about the size of a quarter, sticks on the back of the cell phone or other device. Pope says it provides a shield against the harmful effects of electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation.
“And, what a lot of people don’t realize is our devices such as our phones, laptops, tablets, routers and baby monitors all emit electromagnetic radiation,” said Pope.
It has been debated, for years, whether or not that radiation poses any real health risks. Pope says research suggests it does. Just last month, The California Department of Public Health cautioned people to decrease their exposure to cell phones of possible cancer risks and other health issues.
It warned that children are more susceptible to long-term health problems, especially when engaged in frequent and long-term use. CDPH Director and State Public Health Officer Dr. Karen Smith was quoted in a press release issued in December, as saying:
“Children’s brains develop through the teenage years and may be more affected by cell phone use… Parents should consider reducing the time their children use cell phones and encourage them to turn the devices off at night.”
The agency issued guidelines to reduce exposure. Pope, an expecting grandfather, says their product takes it a step further.
This technology has been evolving over the past 8 or 9 years. I just recently got involved, after seeing new studies, that are calling out the damage that is being caused,” he said. “Some scientists are calling the potential for an epidemic for this next generation as a result of those high Wi-Fi use devices, constantly. I see young women, who are expecting, with devices on their stomachs and close to their unborn children. I just have a real passion to get this to these young people before any damage is done.”
It is likely, we won’t fully understand the real impact of increased EMF radiation for generations. Pope does not claim the Kids Armour technology will provide 100-percent prevention or protection, but says research has shown that it will, greatly, minimize risk.
“We’ve had this tested by a reputable third-party organization and concluded this does protect children from the harmful effects of EMF radiation,” he said. “The technology underwent a randomized, double-blind, placebo-based test at the Jasper Clinic in Kalamazoo, which is the most elite or accurate type of testing available.”
Company reps will be at the Kids and Family Expo, this weekend. And, they are offering the device free, for the month of February, to expecting mothers. Kids Armour is currently available online only at the moment.
Does Wifi Give Off Radiation, Is Wifi Radiation Harmful, Radiation Wi-fi Trees, Radiation Wifi Tablet, Wifi Radiation, Wifi Radiation Effects, Wifi Radiation Protection, Wifi Router Radiation, Wifi Shield Silver Radiation Protector
YUKON, Okla. — In 2012, Oklahoma Gas and Electric released a modern way to read electrical usage of each home. It was called the Smart Meter and it would replace old analog readers which were often found to be faulty and unreliable.
Six years later, the Oklahoma Legislature is attempting to sign a bill which will eliminate Smart Meters and replace them with an electric alternative.
The second session of the 56 th Oklahoma Legislature proposed House Bill 2872, commonly known as the Smart Meter Bill. Actions in this bill will replace Smart Meters from each home in Oklahoma with a safer, electrical-based meter.
One of the main reasons for the change is due to the health of the customers of OG&E.
Three health agencies and a medical report; the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the National Toxicology Program, the Studies of the Toxicology Carcinogenicity of Cell Phone Radiation and the 2012 Bio Initiative Reports; have shown a steady decrease in health among users of the Smart Meters.
“Non-ionizing radiation from radio frequencies shared by cell phones and smart meters produced increased rates of highly malignant very rare tumors: gliomas of the brain and schwannomas of the heart,” the House Bill, authored by Rep. David Derby (R-Owasso), reads.
This report has been confirmed by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Gliomas are known as malignant tumors which are connected to the nervous system.
Schwannomas, according to the Cancer Research Institute, is a “tumor of the tissue that covers nerves, called the nerve sheath.
The report also concludes that the radio transmissions from the Smart Meter are the one of the direct causes of these issues.
Change of the electric meters has been called for as early as 2012. Reports from KFOR and News 9 report that many people throughout the state, including Oklahoman Monique Smith, were getting migraines, regular nose-bleeds and overall health issues. In 2013, Red Dirt Reportcovered one case of an Smart Meter bursting into flames on a house in Oklahoma City. And in 2015, this online newspaper reported on a Midwest City woman, Debbie Vancendrock, who had a confrontation with local police after demanding the radiation-emitting devices be removed from her home.
As Vancendrock told a Red Dirt Report reporter at the time: ““I’ve been totally surrounded by radiation. I am overloaded. It feels like I’ve been hit with a Taser when I’m overloaded. It’s all I can do to crawl into my bed. One time, I thought I was seeing Jesus.”
Indeed.
And yet the utilities like OG&E have largely ignored conerns of citizens over these devices and declined to remove the meters. This was due to large amount of effort put into placing these Smart Meters out across the state.
The people affected by these Smart Meters are experiencing what medical professional call Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity.
Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity, known as EHS, is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields. Some of the symptoms are similar to the effects given off by the Smart Meters.
House Bill 2872 will replace these Smart Meters will a more electrical based meter instead of a meter relying off of radio transmissions. The connections will account for each house and be directly submitted to the company. This action will eliminate the need for electricians to come to each house and read the meter on the sides of the houses.
Installation will happen within 90 days of the House Bill being signed into effect due to the nature of events surrounding the necessity for change.
There will be no additional cost or fee to OG&E customers as technicians install the new meter.
Like any machinery, it is only a matter of time before a malfunction happens. Aside from the monthly billing, there is no service charge for fixing the issue.
If the electric company needs to inspect the meter for malfunctions or routine maintenance is necessary, the company must have written consent from each customer and a 90 day notice. This alleviates the issue of impromptu service and no-one at home to ensure the job is done correctly.
One of the only added stipulations on the side of the customer is the information shared with the electric company.
When the electric company installs the electric meter, the electricity is charged through the outlets and outside power sources which is transmitted to the reader. Included in the written consent given by each customer, this is will require customers to give up their information to companies in order to keep track of electrical usage.
The information includes the customer’s name, address, electrical usage and appliances used.
Customers have the option to “opt in” or “opt out” of the option when it comes to electrical usage. What this does is it allows the customers to choose how much electricity the house uses and the options surrounding the uses.
This bill allows for the customer to make the whole bill an ala carte option.
The bill has gained backing from the Republicans and Democrats in the Oklahoma House and Senate. The decision on this bill has yet to be determined.
Red Dirt Report’s Andrew Griffin contributed to this story.
Bge Smart Meter Bill Increase, Eon Smart Meter Bill, Red Energy Smart Meter Bill, Smart Meter And High Electric Bill, Smart Meter Bill, Smart Meter Bill Increase, Smart Meter Bill Spike, Smart Meter Billing Errors, Smart Meter Billing Issues, Smart Meter Billing Software, Smart Meter Doubled My Bill, Smart Meter Electricity Bill Increase, Smart Meter Higher Bill, Smart Meter Increase Bill Uk, Smart Meter Increase Electric Bill, Smart Meter Lower Bill, Smart Meter Monthly Bill, Smart Meter Overbilling, Smart Meter Raises Bill, Smart Meter Standing Charges
Wi-Fi and other free to air electromagnetic waves had long been the subject of suspected detrimental health effects. Some even believe they are in some way allergic to Wi-Fi. Unexplained bouts of headaches, dizziness, and even skin irritation have begun to be blamed on some form of severe discomfort or hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields. The condition has come to be known as electromagnetic hypersensitivity syndrome, or EHS for short, by the World Health Organization.
One recent case of a 15-year old girl from the UK claims that she committed suicide because of her exposure to Wi-Fi signals. Her family claimed that signals at her school made her feel physically sick as well as suffer from blinding headaches. So bad were these, it is claimed, that she found it hard to concentrate. The case was actually reported on by the Daily Mirror.
Another survey of people who claimed to suffer from EHS described physical symptoms like headaches and fatigue that seemed to appear whenever they were close to EM signals. Like Wi-Fi stations, computer screens or even cellphones. They also claimed that if they insulated themselves or removed themselves from the source their symptoms eased.
“EHS is characterized by a variety of non-specific symptoms, which afflicted individuals attribute to exposure to EMF. The symptoms most commonly experienced include dermatological symptoms (redness, tingling, and burning sensations) as well as neurasthenic and vegetative symptoms (fatigue, tiredness, concentration difficulties, dizziness, nausea, heart palpitation, and digestive disturbances). The collection of symptoms is not part of any recognized syndrome.”
They go on to describe it as resembling multiple chemical sensitivities with a range of non-specific symptoms that seem to lack any apparent toxicological or physiological basis.
In an interview with LiveScience, Dr. James Rubin, a Senior Lecturer in Psychology at King’s College, London, stated he believes EHS sufferers are indeed ill. He has conducted research into EHS and was also the author of the 2009 Bio Electro Magnetics review. Rubin told them that “[But] the science suggests that it isn’t [electromagnetic signaling] that is causing the illness.” The WHO does state on their website that EHS sufferers tend to have “a variety of nonspecific symptoms,” and they also state that “EHS is not a medical diagnosis.”
“There is no scientific basis to link EHS symptoms to EMF (electromagnetic frequency) exposure,” states the WHO on its website.
EHS symptoms tend to vary widely from person to person but are usually rather general in nature. This would seem to indicate a wide variety of actual causes. Headaches, for example, have many causal factors including early symptoms of a cold or not drinking enough water. Other symptoms like dizziness can be caused by flu-like infections or even a lack of sleep.
Some have reported that their EHS symptoms are so severe they should be considered a real disability. Parents of one 12-year old boy recently filed a lawsuit in Massachusetts against their local private school. They claimed that the newly installed “industrial-capacity Wi-Fi” system had led to their son’s health problems.
The boy reported the usual general symptoms associated with EHS but also claimed EMF led to nose bleeds and heart palpitations. These symptoms, it was claimed, only showed up during school hours. Evaluations of the Wi-Fi system showed it was well within the safety parameters set by the FCC and the case was dismissed.
Controlled experiments indicate it may be psychosomatic
There have been a variety of studies undertaken over the years. EHS individuals were exposed to EMF signals similar to those that have been linked to their patient’s symptoms. As you can imagine the aim of these tests was to formally investigate and link symptoms under laboratory conditions. In the vast majority of cases, the EHS individuals were unable to detect EMF exposure any more accurately than non-EHS sufferers. Any positive results were simply a matter chance.
Experiments often included well controlled, double-blind studies that show that symptoms do not correlate well with EMF exposure. Because of this, it has now been suggested that the observed symptoms might be the results of environmental factors completely unrelated to EMF exposure.
This could include things like fluorescent light flicker, glare from computer monitors and poor ergonomic design of chairs and workstations. Other considerations such as poor indoor air quality, workloads and stress in the work and home environment probably also contribute to the sufferers’ declared symptoms. In some cases, pre-existing conditions probably also play a part, not to mention psychological reactions linked to worrying about an unfounded perceived threat such as exposure to EMF.
A review of 46 of these studies was published int the journal Bio Electro Magnetics. Most, if not all, agree with the findings of WHO. On the whole, participants were unable to determine whether EMF signals were present to a statistically significant level.
Is EHS a red-herring or real?
Dr. Rubin’s review encompassed studies of the symptoms of more than 1,000 people claiming to suffer from EHS. His formal review concluded that “repeated experiments have been unable to replicate this phenomenon under controlled conditions.”
It seems, therefore, that Wi-Fi and other EM signals are not to blame. Those claiming to suffer some form of allergic reaction to Wi-Fi are clearly ill in some way but whether its psychosomatic or caused by other environmental “pollutants” is yet to be determined. It could turn out that allergies are indeed the cause just not to EM radiation.
There is another factor that played a part in the curious case of EHS. Termed the “nocebo effect”, it is a specific psychological disorder whereby a person believes EMF can trigger symptoms so much they actually physically appear in the patient. This can occur even when no exposure has occurred.
There is still some way to go to discover whether EHS is real or not but the suffering people feel is definitely real.
Study: Mom’s Exposure During Pregnancy Raises Kids’ Asthma Risk By Brenda Goodman, MA
Aug. 1, 2011 — Researchers seeking to explain the rising number of asthma cases in children have fingered a new suspect: electromagnetic fields (EMFs), energy that can’t been seen or felt that is generated by household appliances, electronic devices, cars, and power lines.
In a study, they found that babies born to women who are exposed to stronger EMFs during pregnancy had more than triple the risk of developing asthma compared to babies born to women exposed to weaker EMFs.
In other words, about 13% of children born to women in the group with the lowest EMF exposures developed asthma compared to about 33% of children born to women who had high EMF exposures.
“That’s a striking figure,” says David Savitz, PhD, a professor of community health and obstetrics and gynecology at Brown University in Providence, R.I. “That magnitude of association we don’t see very often. If it was correct, and that’s a big ‘if,’ that would be really startling.”
Savitz, who has studied the health effects of electromagnetic fields but was not involved in the research, says that while the finding is interesting, there’s no reason to give up using a hair dryer or microwave just yet.
He says that unlike contaminants like cigarette smoke or lead that are known to be dangerous, there’s little evidence that low-frequency EMFs, the kind measured in the study, are harmful.
“This has been very, very thoroughly studied, and it really is questionable whether it causes any health effects at any reasonable level,” Savitz tells WebMD. “It’s certainly not something that falls into the category of a known hazard.”
But Savitz and others acknowledge that all research has to start somewhere.
“There are a lot of important topics that started out looking pretty flaky and pretty unlikely. There was a time when it made no sense that smoking could be bad for you,” he says.
Other experts agree.
“The study appears to be well executed and the finding is surprising,” says Jonathan M. Samet, MD, a pulmonologist and epidemiologist at the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles.
Influenza A Treatment, Influenza Definition, Influenza Immunization, Influenza In Children, Influenza In Pregnancy, Influenza Incubation Period, Influenza Or Cold, Influenza Outbreak 1918, Influenza Replication Cycle, Influenza Report, Influenza Rhyme, Influenza Season, Influenza Shot, Influenza Strains, Influenza Treatment, Influenza Vaccine, Influenza Wiki, Influenza With Gastroenteritis, Influenza Without Cough, Influenza Without Fever
David Fancy first noticed it while was living in Montreal in the early 2000s.
He got headaches and heard ringing in his ears after he used his cell phone. It got worse when he moved into an apartment near power lines and a cell tower. It got so bad, he had to move out.
He finally discovered an explanation that seemed to make sense: “electromagnetic hypersensitivity,” or “EHS” for short.
“Simplest terms, it’s an allergy to human-made electromagnetic emissions,” says David, a dramatic arts professor at Brock University in St. Catharines, Ont.
Reported symptoms of EHS include headaches, ear ringing, dizziness, nerve pain, burning skin sensations and heart palpitations. Common triggers are cell phones, WiFi, Bluetooth signals, cell towers, power lines and, in extreme cases, anything electric.
David Fancy says he started feeling symptoms of ‘electromagnetic hypersensitivity’ in the early 2000s, and was forced to move because of it. (Sam Colbert)
“There was an extensive period where I had to live outside because I was unable to tolerate being indoors,” David says. “Simply being in the electrical environment of a household was impossible.”
Health Canada’s position is that there’s no scientific evidence to support electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
Some studies have blamed the “nocebo” effect. That’s the flip side of the placebo effect, when the expectation of a negative outcome causes that outcome. In other words, it might be psychological.
Or perhaps the symptoms associated with EHS are caused by something else, and have nothing to do with electromagnetic fields.
But David expresses frustration with the skepticism over EHS.
“Anybody who wholesale disregards the lived experience of thousands or tens of thousands of people, without investigating or trying to understand them, in this day and age, is described as bigoted, prejudiced and discriminatory,” he says.
He lived in a woodlot in the Niagara region for three years. At Brock, he was able to continue teaching at a location off campus.
“You go through an initial phase of feeling hunted, frankly, where you don’t understand the correlation between the trigger and the experience,” he says.
After David was told that EHS might be the culprit for his symptoms, he worked with a team of environmental physicians. He says he is now able to tolerate electromagnetic fields at low levels or short durations. He built himself a house out in the country, specially designed to limit exposure.
He’s also been helping others who’ve had similar experiences, and is hopeful that EHS will become more widely recognized and treated.
“Change takes time. And I’m comfortable with skepticism, as long as the skeptics take time to look at all the research.”
Electric and magnetic fields are invisible areas of energy (also called radiation) that are produced by electricity, which is the movement of electrons, or current, through a wire.
An electric field is produced by voltage, which is the pressure used to push the electrons through the wire, much like water being pushed through a pipe. As the voltage increases, the electric field increases in strength. Electric fields are measured in volts per meter (V/m).
A magnetic field results from the flow of current through wires or electrical devices and increases in strength as the current increases. The strength of a magnetic field decreases rapidly with increasing distance from its source. Magnetic fields are measured in microteslas (μT, or millionths of a tesla).
Electric fields are produced whether or not a device is turned on, whereas magnetic fields are produced only when current is flowing, which usually requires a device to be turned on. Power lines produce magnetic fields continuously because current is always flowing through them. Electric fields are easily shielded or weakened by walls and other objects, whereas magnetic fields can pass through buildings, living things, and most other materials.
Electric and magnetic fields together are referred to as electromagnetic fields, or EMFs. The electric and magnetic forces in EMFs are caused by electromagnetic radiation. There are two main categories of EMFs:
Higher-frequency EMFs, which include x-rays and gamma rays. These EMFs are in the ionizing radiation part of the electromagnetic spectrum and can damage DNA or cells directly.
Low- to mid-frequency EMFs, which include static fields (electric or magnetic fields that do not vary with time), magnetic fields from electric power lines and appliances, radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation, and visible light. These EMFs are in the non-ionizing radiation part of the electromagnetic spectrum and are not known to damage DNA or cells directly. Low- to mid-frequency EMFs include extremely low frequency EMFs (ELF-EMFs) and radiofrequency EMFs. ELF-EMFs have frequencies of up to 300 cycles per second, or hertz (Hz), and radiofrequency EMFs range from 3 kilohertz (3 kHz, or 3,000 Hz) to 300 gigahertz (300 GHz, or 300 billion Hz). Radiofrequency radiation is measured in watts per meter squared (W/m2).
The electromagnetic spectrum represents all of the possible frequencies of electromagnetic energy. It ranges from extremely long wavelengths (extremely low frequency exposures such as those from power lines) to extremely short wavelengths (x-rays and gamma rays) and includes both non-ionizing and ionizing radiation.
Are Electric And Magnetic Fields Separate Things, Crossed Uniform Electric And Magnetic Fields, Electric And Magnetic Field Amplitude, Electric And Magnetic Field Calculation, Electric And Magnetic Field Calculations With Finite-element Methods, Electric And Magnetic Field Cannot Accelerate, Electric And Magnetic Field Components, Electric And Magnetic Field Components Of An Electromagnetic Wave, Electric And Magnetic Field Of A Moving Charge, Electric And Magnetic Field Of Dipole Antenna, Electric And Magnetic Field Of The Heart, Electric And Magnetic Field Sensors, Electric And Magnetic Field Shielding, Electric And Magnetic Field Similarities, Electric And Magnetic Field Simulator, Electric And Magnetic Field Strength, Electric And Magnetic Field Theory, Electric And Magnetic Field Transformation, Electric And Magnetic Field Transmission
I’ve gotten the question here on the show for years. And it’s natural to wonder about it. When you put your phone against your head, is the radiation that’s emitted doing physical harm to your body?
It begged the question no one wanted to ask or know the answer to, will using your phone give you cancer?
YUKON, Okla. — In 2012, Oklahoma Gas and Electric released a modern way to read electrical usage of each home. It was called the Smart Meter and it would replace old analog readers which were often found to be faulty and unreliable.
Aug. 1, 2011 — Researchers seeking to explain the rising number of 
